Scherer v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs in each of the above-entitled actions, which by order of court were consolidated for trial, appeal upon the same record from, a judgment entered in each case for defendant, upon directed verdicts returned by the jury.
Both actions were for alleged injuries suffered by plaintiffs in a collision between an automobile in which they were riding and a passenger train operated by defendant. The complaint charges negligence on the part of defendant in, first, failing “to install and keep any audible or visible warning device at, near or over said grade crossing ’ ’ where…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Sullivan v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1939
- Chinnis v. Pomona Pump Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Downing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hoffart v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.