Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hills

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1971No. 50909Published

1DissentBarham, Justice

After the State had put on its evidence concerning the rape of the prosecuting witness by this defendant, it then presented evidence of other crimes allegedly committed by the defendant. The question of the admissibility of the evidence attempting to connect the defendant with other offenses is raised in several bills of exception.

My own finding of the facts shown by the evidence of these other acts is not wholly in accord with that of the majority, but these differences do not influence my view that the testimony and other evidence of these offenses, received over objection, are inadmissible…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. CrookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  4. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. State v. HopperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API