Legal Opinion
Norman Quincy Wright v. Nevil C. Trammell, Jr. Charles M. Traughber Linda K. Miller Donna Blackburn and Ed Hoover
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1987No. 85-6053PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Per curiam
The pro se appellant, Norman Quincy Wright, is appealing the October 23, 1985, order of the district court dismissing his civil rights case. He is an inmate at Nashville Community Service Center, Tennessee.
The case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon consideration of the briefs, documents filed on appeal, and the record, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed, the parties having adequately briefed and developed the issues. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
On June 4, 1985, the appellant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawrence Wagner v. John J. Gilligan, GovernorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Gary S. Mayes v. Nevin C. Trammell, Chairman, Board of Pardons & Paroles, and Members of the Tennessee Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Paul N. Sharp v. Gordon B. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by62 opinions
- Kaylor v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Miller v. CampbellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Troy Dace v. George Mickelson, Harold Shunk, and Jon EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Drummer v. LuttrellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
- Reginald Dion Hughes v. Tennessee Board of Probation and ParoleTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.