Gary S. Mayes v. Nevin C. Trammell, Chairman, Board of Pardons & Paroles, and Members of the Tennessee Parole Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether Tennessee’s parole scheme creates a liberty interest protected by the due process clause. The issue arises in connection with a claim filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint essentially consists of a challenge to the procedures utilized by the Tennessee Board of Parole at plaintiff’s parole hearing and, in connection therewith, alleges a deprivation of liberty without due process of law. The district court dismissed the complaint, holding that the Tennessee statute and rules do not create a liberty interest.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wendell Bills v. Murray HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Walker v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Michael Boothe v. Edward Hammock, Chairman, New York State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kaylor v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Crump v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Inmates of Orient Correctional Institute v. Ohio State Adult Parole AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- William R. Beard, Jr. v. Gary J. Livesay, Warden Robert Davies, Acting Warden and Evans Fine, Director of Offender ClassificationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.