Legal Opinion

City of Mangum v. Powell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1946No. 31971PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The judgment was entered against the city upon jury verdict in plaintiffs’ action for damages resulting from death by drowning of their ten-year-old son.

Defendant here asserts:

“The evidence in this case is insufficient to sustain any sort of judgment against the City of Mangum,”

—and:

“The lake or pond in which Dwain Powell drowned, being a reproduction ■of a natural lake and not being equipped with any diving boards, docks, rafts •or other paraphernalia of any kind was not an attractive nuisance.”

The facts are as follows: In June, 1940, defendant purchased some 28 acres of rough canyon land…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hargreaves v. DeaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Bransom's adm'r v. LabrotCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  4. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Klix v. NiemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lohrenz v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Dennis v. SpillersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Death of Lofton v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. BROWN v. DEMPSTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API