Legal Opinion

Gatena v. County of Orange

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 5, 1999No. 98-417CIVORL22BPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CONWAY, District Judge.

I. Introduction.

This cause is before the Court on a challenge to the constitutionality of section 26-26 of the Orange County Code, which prohibits public nudity with some exceptions. Plaintiff, Kim Gatena (“Gatena”), is a nude dancer. Gatena believes that a nude woman engaged in dance, combined with music, is an art form which conveys “an important message of sexuality and eroticism.” [Compl. § IV.C.] Gatena claims that Orange County’s public nudity ordinance unconstitutionally infringes upon her right to continue in her chosen profession, expand her livelihood,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larry Horton v. City of St. AugustineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API