Dillon v. Craig
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case and trover by Hugh Dillon against Frank D. Craig and others. A judgment for certain defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error. Affirmed as to a part of the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
In the language of plaintiff’s brief—
‘ ‘ Plaintiff brought this action of trespass on the case and trover against the defendants jointly to recover damages for unlawfully depriving him of certain policies of insurance, and of ten thousand ($10,000.00) dollars of money, etc., received by the defendants upon the adjustment of a fire loss thereunder.”
The first count in the declaration, after reciting that plaintiff was engaged in the retail -dry goods business, that on the 5th day of February (1907) a fire occurred, which destroyed a greater part of his stock, etc., that he had certain insurance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haines v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Storrs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Doyle v. PeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Kalamazoo v. Standard Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Mahder v. WaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Roth v. RubertMichigan Supreme Court · 1913