Legal Opinion

Miller v. Meeks

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2000No. 1999-CA-00210-SCTPublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

762 So.2d 302 (2000)

Sheila Fox MILLER, Peggy Fox Watz and Gary Merkell Fox, Next Friends and Sole Beneficiaries of the Intestate Estate of M. Merkell Fox

v.

W. Mark MEEKS, M.D.

No. 1999-CA-00210-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 29, 2000.

Barry Stuart Zirulnik, Jackson, James Frederick Ahrend, Gulfport, Attorneys for Appellants.

C. York Craig, Jr., Stuart G. Kruger, Jackson, Attorneys for Appellee.

EN BANC.

MILLS, Justice, for the Court:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

¶ 1. This case comes on appeal from the Circuit Court of Hinds County. A medical malpractice complaint was filed by Merkell M. Fox against…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · McRAE; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · McRAE.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. James v. JaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. Messina v. BurdenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Short v. Columbus Rubber and Gasket Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Davis v. HossMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Harrison v. Chandler-Sampson Ins., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Price v. Purdue Pharma Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  5. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. v. LoweryMississippi Supreme Court · 2005

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API