Legal Opinion

Jones v. McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 17, 1897No. 386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. *

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was the defendant below. The action was for the conversion of goods alleged to have been of the value of $2,500. There was a written waiver of trial by jury, and the court, upon a special finding of the facts, gave judgment for the plaintiff for a sum less than $2,000.

Jurisdiction of the case was not lost by reason of the finding that the goods converted were worth less than the jurisdictional amount, since it does not appear, nor is there shown reason to believe, that the value was overstated in the declaration for the purpose of conferring *296jurisdic…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. StappCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1892
  2. Pickham v. Wheeler-Bliss Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
  3. Matthews v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swofford Bros. Dry-Goods Co. v. MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Wyoming · 1898
  2. Southern Rail & Equipment Co. v. Midwest Mfg. & Plating Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Stanton Trust & Savings Bank v. Northern Montana Ass'n of Credit MenMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ung Lung Chung v. HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API