Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. $223,405.86

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 2016No. 1141044 and 1150027Published

1ConcurrenceShaw, Justice

(concurring in the result in case no. 1141044).

I concur in the result. I write specially to note the following.

Electronic bingo is not “bingo”, under Alabama law. Houston Cty. Econ. Dev. Auth. v. State, 168 So.3d 4 (Ala.2014); Barber v. Cornerstone Cmty. Outreach, Inc., 42 So.3d 65 (Ala.2009). Wagering in electronic bingo is thus an illegal form of gambling.20 Specifically, art. IV, § 65, of the Alabama Constitution of 1901, prohibits what it describes as “lotteries or gift enterprises”:

“The legislature shall have no power to authorize lotteries or gift enterprises for any purposes, and shall…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. James v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Barber v. Jefferson County Racing Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Barber v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API