Legal Opinion

Louisville Bear Safety Service, Inc. v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 15, 1978PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANT, Judge.

Appellant, Louisville Bear Safety Service, Inc. (Bear Safety), brought suit for alleged breach of contract and negligence against appellee, South Central Bell Telephone Company (South Central Bell), for a mistake in Bear Safety’s advertisement appearing in the Yellow Pages of the 1973 telephone directory. The advertisement consisted of a standard listing of name, address and phone number, all of which were cor rect, ⅛ “ancho, the disi Safety’s the anch 461, the referred to as an :ts the reader to Although Bear ed on Page 462, it was on Page e listing itself.

The coi ^>Keu tor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Gas House, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. State ex rel. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Hargis v. BaizeKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Discount Fabric House of Racine, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Michael Schnuerle v. Insight Communications Company, L.P.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  5. McClure Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API