State v. McCalister
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal by the state from a dispositional departure for the offense of receiving stolen property. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent McCalister was charged by separate complaint with receiving stolen property and with a fifth degree controlled substance offense (possession of cocaine) arising from separate incidents. McCalis-ter was tried by the court, and convicted, of receiving stolen property. He then entered a guilty plea on the possession offense. The plea agreement provided that the two offenses were to be sentenced concurrently-
McCalister had accumulated 170 days…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011