Legal Opinion

State v. McCalister

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1990No. C9-90-1746PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal by the state from a dispositional departure for the offense of receiving stolen property. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent McCalister was charged by separate complaint with receiving stolen property and with a fifth degree controlled substance offense (possession of cocaine) arising from separate incidents. McCalis-ter was tried by the court, and convicted, of receiving stolen property. He then entered a guilty plea on the possession offense. The plea agreement provided that the two offenses were to be sentenced concurrently-

McCalister had accumulated 170 days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API