State v. Moody
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s imposition of jail time as a condition of a stay of adjudication of his guilty plea to fifth-degree controlled-substanee possession. Because appellant consented to the district court’s stay and the state’s recommendation of jail time, we affirm.
FACTS
Shortly after midnight on June 3, 2010, a Princeton police officer approached a vehicle parked after-hours in a city park. The officer discovered appellant David Steven Moody and a passenger in the vehicle, and observed drug paraphernalia in plain view on the floor behind the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. FribergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014