Ameigh v. Baycliffs Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This civil action presents two issues. We must first determine whether the court of appeals was correct in its holding that the property owners’ cause of action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We must also examine the court of appeals’ holding that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider the declaratory judgment action brought by the property owners because the property owners failed to exhaust their administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Our analysis of the law and record causes us to conclude that the cause of action brought by the property owners is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Jones v. Village of Chagrin FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. ForduCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Simmons-Harris v. ZelmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. Hall, 2007-T-0022 (5-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ross v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. DickOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.