Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hickerson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1956No. 27914Published

1DissentWoodley, Judge

The reversal of this conviction is predicated upon Bill of Exception No. 2, which complains of several separate remarks of the county attorney in his closing argument. To some of these objection was sustained and the argument withdrawn from the jury; to others, no objection or exception is shown, and to the remainder objection was overruled and exception noted.

*450Since the 1953 amendment of Article 667, V.A.C.C.P., the fact that the bill of exception is multifarious will not prevent its consideration by this court.

The writer does not understand, however, that the several claims of error…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Beauchamp v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API