Legal Opinion

Butler v. Carney

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 2, 1936No. 6375, 6646, 6644, 6645, 6661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

These five suits were brought to recover taxes illegally collected under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and the Act as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.

The case of William M. Butler et al. v. Carney, No. 6375, was begun by a writ dated April 22, 1935. Both processing taxes and floor stocks taxes are involved. The plaintiffs allege that they have filed claims for the refund of these taxes on the ground that the act imposing them was beyond the powers of Congress under the Constitution of the United States, and that their claims have been rejected by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  2. Seligman's, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1939
  3. Edwin Cigar Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  4. Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  5. Wilkes Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. MundyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API