Legal Opinion

Wilkes Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. Mundy

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1937No. 3780PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff sued the collector of internal revenue for the recovery of the sum of $119,959.69, which the plaintiff claims was wrongfully exacted as processing and floor taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act (as amended [7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.]). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that by the provisions of title 7 of the Revenue Act of 1936 (sections 901-917 [7 U.S.C.A. §§ 623 note, 644-659]), this court is deprived of jurisdiction of this action in so far as it seeks recovery of amounts paid by the plaintiff as processing tax; that,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API