Wilkes Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. Mundy
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff sued the collector of internal revenue for the recovery of the sum of $119,959.69, which the plaintiff claims was wrongfully exacted as processing and floor taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act (as amended [7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.]). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that by the provisions of title 7 of the Revenue Act of 1936 (sections 901-917 [7 U.S.C.A. §§ 623 note, 644-659]), this court is deprived of jurisdiction of this action in so far as it seeks recovery of amounts paid by the plaintiff as processing tax; that,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941