Legal Opinion

State v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 2001No. 19390-0-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

37 P.3d 1220 (2001)

109 Wash.App. 516

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Logan C. BALDWIN, Petitioner.

No. 19390-0-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Seven.

December 20, 2001.

Logan C. Baldwin, pro se.

Dominic M. Bartoletta, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Patrick T. Johnson, Jr., Brian C. O'Brien, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SCHULTHEIS, J.

Washington's implied consent statute, RCW 46.20.308, authorizes a police officer who reasonably believes that a driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs to ask the driver to take a breath or blood test. The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MartinesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Bernardi v. KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
  4. Stevens County v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. In Re WissinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API