Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Nink

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1979No. 78-351PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lindberg

This action was brought in the Circuit Court of Ogle County by plaintiff Sarah Dodson to recover a *3,000 earnest money deposit held in escrow by defendant John Nink, a real estate broker, pursuant to a contract for sale of real estate owned by defendants Thomas and Nancy Chaplin. After a bench trial, the circuit court entered an order permitting plaintiff to recover the *3,000 earnest money deposit in its entirety, ruling that a condition precedent contained in the contract never occurred and that the contract was not enforceable. Defendants have appealed. The primary issue presented for review…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shay v. PenroseIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Baston v. CliffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Smith v. VernonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Linster v. ReganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Pruett v. La Salceda, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. A/s Apothekernes Laboratorium for Specialpraeparater v. I.M.C. Chemical Group, Inc. And Dr. M.B. GillisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Midwest Builder Distributing, Inc. v. Lord and Essex, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Kilianek v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API