Legal Opinion

Shay v. Penrose

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1962No. 37026PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

This is an appeal from a final order of the city court of Sterling in an action for the partition of real estate, striking certain affirmative defenses and dismissing the amended counterclaim of the defendant, Grace Penrose. A freehold is involved.

Carol M. Shay individually acquired six parcels of real estate in her lifetime. Between 1955 and i960 she executed contracts for deed to separate purchasers of four of the properties. None of the contracts is set out in full but it appears from the pleadings that they are the type of contract for deed in common usage by the profession. Each provided…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lombard v. Chicago Sinai CongregationIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Chappell v. McKnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Rhodes v. MeredithIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Fuller v. BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Knights v. KnightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Rosewood Corp. v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Streets & Beard Farm Partnership, Debtor. Loren and Doris Mitchell v. David Streets, Shari Streets, Fred Beard, and Reynolds M. Everett, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Daniels v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Estate of MartinekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. State Farm General Insurance v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API