Legal Opinion
Koutrakos v. Astrue
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 13, 2012No. 3:11-CV-306 (CSH)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHARLES S. HAIGHT, JR., Senior District Judge.
Defendant Michael J. Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), has filed a timely objection [Doc. 25] to a Recommended Ruling filed by Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis [Doc. 24], Plaintiff Nancy E. Koutrakos defends the Recommended Ruling. [Doc. 26]. This Court considers the propriety of the Recommended Ruling de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McLeod v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3Cited by19 opinions
- Henry v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Bales v. Bright Solar Marketing LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
- Case v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Dunsford v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Harry Lee Wilson v. CEO Todd Jones, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.