Legal Opinion
Gund v. Roulier
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1922No. 21947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tewell, District Judge.
This is an aetion brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained on account of the failure of the defendant to deliver wheat as per the terms of a written contract, as follows :
“July 7,1916. Contract No. 53. This is to certify that I have this day contracted and sold to Gund & Peterson -bushels of wheat at 85 cents per bushel (-lbs. per bushel) to be clean, sound and dry and to grade No. 2, to be delivered into their elevator or cribs at Campbell on *590or before the 30th day of Aug. 1916. If damaged or inferior grain is delivered and accepted on this contract,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Pitcairn v. Philip Hiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Curry v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Stanley v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Dodd v. KemnitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'Brien v. FrickeNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Company "A" First Regiment North Dakota National Guard Training School v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- McClintock v. AyersWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Foot, Schulze & Co. v. SkeffingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Lefferdink v. SchmutteNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.