Dearden v. Liberty Medical Center, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
Linda Dearden believes that she has a grievance against her employer. There is available to her, as part of her employment contract, a specific, multi-step grievance procedure which she has declined to use on the ground that it would be “fruitless.” Instead, she sued the employer in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, seeking a declaratory judgment that the employer, by its conduct, breached her employment contract, and $50,000 in damages. The court dismissed her complaint, on the employer’s motion, for failure to exhaust her contractual remedies. We shall affirm.
Ms. Dearden…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Pope v. Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Gazunis v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Acorn Land, LLC v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Prince George's County v. O'BerryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.