Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1972No. 6088PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

This appeal presents the sole question whether the information, under which appellant was convicted, should have been dismissed for failure to allege essential facts constituting an offense.

The information, filed under D.C.Code 1967, § 22-1107, entitled “Unlawful assembly — Profane and indecent language”, was on a printed form with check marks to indicate the particular violation. When the irrelevant parts of the printed form are eliminated, the information charged:

Appellant under circumstances likely to cause a breach of the peace did congregate and assemble with others in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bush v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Arthur Kinoy v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. Hunter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. MiqueliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. In re A. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. PendergrastDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. In re D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API