Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Eichwedel
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis
This case involves a murder-for-insurance scheme. While harboring the intent to secure the murder of his brother-in-law, David Schultz, Paul Eichwedel procured an insurance policy on Schultz’s life worth $250,000 from Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company. Eight months later, Schultz was murdered and Eichwedel collected the insurance money. Eichwedel was subsequently implicated in the murder.
Simply put, the issue now is who, if anybody, is entitled to the life insurance proceeds. We conclude that the insurance policy was void from the inception and, therefore, Federal Kemper is entitled to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor v. MenkhausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Hugo Romanelli and Norma Romanelli v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Terpstra v. Niagara Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beehn v. EppardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Beehn v. EppardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. ByronIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. ByronIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Phillip Morris v. ByronIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.