Legal Opinion · Dissent

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Byron

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2007No. 104657Published

1DissentJustice Freeman

This court allows the motion of Philip Morris USA, Inc., for a supervisory order (188 Ill. 2d R. 383). In the exercise of our supervisory authority, this court directs the circuit court of Madison County to vacate its certification of questions for interlocutory appeal to the appellate court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 in Price v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., No. 00 L 112, and to enter an order dismissing plaintiffs postjudgment motion pursuant to section 2 — 1203 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1203 (West 2006)). I respectfully dissent.

I. BACKGROUND

The supervisory order in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kaiser v. MEPC American Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. PSL Realty Co. v. Granite Investment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Eastern v. CantyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API