Legal Opinion
Clark v. Reddick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 9, 2010No. A10-1527PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*293OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner Harlan Clark filed this action seeking to remove the name of Bert Pexsa from the 2010 general election ballot as a candidate for State Representative, House District 11B, on grounds that the Douglas County Auditor erred in accepting for filing Pexsa’s affidavit of candidacy without a nominating petition. Clark asserts that the Auditor further erred in allowing Pex-sa to amend his affidavit of candidacy after the close of the candidate filing period. Because we concluded that Clark’s petition is barred by the doctrine of laches, we issued an order on September 13, 2010,…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Peterson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Clark v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Winters v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Carlson v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Monaghen v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Peter K Butler v. Shari MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State Farm Life Insurance Company v. YoungsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022