Legal Opinion

Houston v. Houston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 17, 2004No. A04A0870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following the trial court’s grant of Ronald Houston’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Allyson Houston, his daughter, appeals, contending that her complaint sufficiently alleged promissory estoppel regarding her father’s promise to pay half of her college costs. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

“A trial court should grant a motion to dismiss only when, assuming the allegations in the complaint are true, the plaintiff would not be entitled to any relief under the facts as stated and the defendant demonstrates that the plaintiff could not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FlakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Brantley v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Moore v. BellSouth Mobility, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Canterbury Forest Ass'n v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Wright v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hendry v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. MARK GUISE v. JANET BETH LEONICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  3. Meade, LLC v. Dekalb Realty Holding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
  4. Scruggs v. PALISADES ACQUISITION XVI, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API