Legal Opinion

Hicklin v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 24, 1929No. 19328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. By the Cummins amendment to the interstate-commerce act, March 4, 1915 (38 Stat. 1196, 1197-7), a carrier is prohibited from providing “by rule, contract, regulation, or otherwise a shorter period of giving notice of claims than ninety days, and for the filing of claims for a shorter period than four months, and for the institution of suits than two years.” It is further provided by this amendment that “if the loss, damage or injury complained of was due to delay or damage while being loaded or unloaded, or damaged in transit by carelessness or negligence, then no notice of claim nor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Warfield & LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. VarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Evans v. Atchison, T. &. S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Louis Ilfeld Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API