Legal Opinion
Jack Rardin, Doing Business as Rardin Graphics v. T & D MacHine Handling, Inc., and Whitacre Sunbelt, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 21, 1989No. 89-1271PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Jack Rardin, the plaintiff, bought for use in his printing business a used printing press from Whitacre-Sunbelt, Inc. for $47,700. The price included an allowance of $1,200 to cover the cost of dismantling the press for shipment and loading it on a truck at Whitacre’s premises in Georgia for transportation to Rardin in Illinois. The contract of sale provided that the press was to be “Sold As Is, Where Is,” that payment was to be made before the removal of the press from Whitacre’s premises, and that Whitacre was to be responsible only for such damage to the press as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- R. Richard Bastian, III v. Petren Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Community Bank of Trenton v. Schnuck Markets, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Arthur Doty v. Richard Sewall, Arthur Doty v. Richard SewallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.