Legal Opinion

Cowell v. Ducas

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The complaint herein is dismissed because it does not contain such allegations as are necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the subject-matter of this cause on the basis of diversity of citizenship. There will, however, be given leave to amend within twenty days on the conditions hereinafter set forth.

In view of the jurisdictional infirmity of the complaint, I am unable to deal with these motions which involve questions of the adequacy of the complaint, and which necessarily presuppose jurisdiction in this court.

I. In a court of limited jurisdiction, such as the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Cameron v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Willis v. Westin Hotel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Gallagher v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Clapp v. Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. Blair Holdings Corporation v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Mohr v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API