Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Bank of Warsaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at April Term, 1921, of WayNe. This was a petition for sale for partition of a small lot in Goldsboro, and the defendant bank pleaded sole seisin. The jury responded to the issue that the plaintiff was owner of an undivided three-fifths interest in the premises, and from the judgment thereon the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE, J., dissenting; WALKER, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. This was a petition for sale for partition of a small lot in Goldsboro, and the defendant bank pleaded sole seisin. The jury responded to the issue that the plaintiff was owner of an undivided three-fifths interest in the premises, and from the judgment thereon the defendant appealed. The plaintiff and defendant claim under a common source of title, and the court so charged the jury, to which there was no exception. The defendant admits in its brief that Needham Kennedy was in possession of the land at the time of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Caldwell v. . NeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Page v. . BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. King v. . McRackanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Crews v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Winstead v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Duckett v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Stallings v. . KeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API