Legal Opinion
Chamberlin v. Hartog, Baer & Hand, APC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 12, 2022No. 3:19-cv-08243Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERLIN, Case No. 19-cv-08243-JCS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PUNITIVE 9 v. DAMAGES AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 HARTOG, BAER & HAND, APC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 125, 131 Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Christopher Chamberlin, pro se, brought this action asserting negligent legal 14 malpractice (and other claims that have since been dismissed) against his former attorneys in a 15 probate matter concerning his late mother’s estate. The remaining defendants at this point in the 16 case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.