Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Seiler Motor Car Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 22, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming.

At the termination of a lease made by the appellants, whom we shall call the “Scbultzes,” to the appellee, whom we shall refer to as the “Motor Co.,” the Scbultzes sought to prevent the Motor Co. from removing from the leased premises certain improvements it had erected thereon, and, having been unsuccessful, the Schultzes have appealed. The property leased was a vacant lot. The duration of the lease was two years.

It was understood the Motor Co. was to use this lot for the display and sale of secondhand automobiles. The Motor Co. cleaned up…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrow Manufacturing Co. v. Race Creek Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Doll v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Tabor v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Cohen v. ReifCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Harrison v. SchluderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Shelbyville v. HartfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Haywood v. . BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Moffat v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Warren Post No. 23, American Legion v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Manis v. GoodletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API