Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Schluder

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 5, 1868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL FROM JEEEERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE CouRT BY

JüDGE PETERS :

In Johnson’s Exr. vs. Wiseman’s Exr. 4 Met. 357, this court said questions respecting the right to what .are called fixtures arise between three classes of persons:

1. Between heir and executor, and there the rule obtains with most rigor in favor of the -inheritance; and against the right to consider as a personal chattel anything which has been affixed to the freehold. 2. Between the executor of a tenant for life and the remainderman, or reversioner, and here the right to fixtures is considered more favorably to executors. 3. Between landlord and tenant;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson's v. Wiseman'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Shelbyville v. HartfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Schultz v. Seiler Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API