Legal Opinion

Brodie v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 20, 2005No. 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPPARD JR., J.,

Defendant, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs, Stefan E. Brodie, Don B. Brodie, Bro-Tech Corporation (The Purolite Company) oppose it. Oral argument was conducted on December 20, 2004.

For the reasons set forth, the motion is granted, in part. The court grants the motion as to Count I (malpractice) and Count III (fiduciary duty) based on the applicable statute of limitations. Otherwise, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

The salient facts as alleged by plaintiffs can be briefly stated.1

Plaintiffs, Stefan E. Brodie and Don B.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API