Legal Opinion

Ford v. McLane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1902No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Maggie Ford against John H. McLane for money loaned. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The statement of questions of fact is taken from the charge of the court to the jury, as follows:

*372‘ ‘ This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of $500, claimed to have been loaned to the defendant by the plaintiff under an oral agreement made between them. On the part of the plaintiff it is claimed that, .while the construction of the Grand Rapids, Belding & Saginaw Railroad was in progress, the agreement in controversy was made; that the principal contractor for the construction of this railroad was William Alden Smith & Co.; that J. H. McLane & Co.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Larson v. JensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. In re the Estate of YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wood v. DodgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Highland Park v. Grant-Mackenzie Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API