Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney General v. Murphy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This .was an information or complaint filed by the Attorney General, in this court, against Frank S. Murphy, an attorney at law of 'this State, seeking to have his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. The material facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of the court."

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

On the 5th day of January, 1884, the Attorney General filed, in this court, an information against Frank S. Murphy, of Galesburg, charging him-with “malconduct” as ah attorney and counselor at law, .upon the filing of which a rule was entered against him.to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys. The information, as originally filed, contained four counts, but subsequently a nolle prosequi was entered as to one, so there are now but three counts upon which issues of fact have been formed.

' Waiving all unnecessary verbiage, the information, as it now stands,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pocius v. HalvorsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kroll v. Sugar Supply Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. W. H. Purcell Co. v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Burgess v. BadgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API