Legal Opinion

Clark v. Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Beplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The defendant is the sheriff of Ionia county, and held the stock of goods in controversy in this cause under several writs of attachments and executions on judgments rendered in the circuit court for said county in favor of Edson, Moore & Co., W. D. Eobinson & Co., and Olney, Shields & Co. against one Clarence E. Monroe. The plaintiffs, claiming to be the owners of the stock, brought replevin against the sheriff, and took the same into their possession under the writ, and on the trial of the cause had judgment.

On the trial of the cause, Frank W. Olark, one of the plaintiffs, was called as a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API