Legal Opinion

Union Co-Operative Store v. Fumagalli

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 5, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action of contract to recover rent alleged to be due and unpaid under á written lease of real estate. Trial was by jury. At the close of all the evidence each party moved for a directed verdict. The plaintiff’s motion was granted and the defendant excepted.

After the motions had been made the presiding judge said: “Both parties having moved for a directed verdict, under the circumstances the Court will direct a verdict in accordance with what the evidence, in the opinion of the court requires.” Counsel for the defendant at once excepted “to the ruling of the Court that it is now the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Mason v. SaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  3. Fitzsimons v. Richardson, Twigg & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  4. Donovan v. TowleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  5. Server v. LangSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petitions of New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  2. Bacon, Receiver v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. William Feinstein Bros., Inc. v. LZ Hotte Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  4. William Feinstein Bros., Inc. v. LZ Hotte Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API