Legal Opinion

Lawrence Wm. Jordan v. The City of Lake Oswego, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1984No. 83-3811PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Jordan brought a civil rights action for damages, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the City of Lake Oswego (City), alleging that his fourteenth amendment due process rights were violated when he was discharged as city attorney. Jordan moved for summary judgment and the City cross moved, arguing that Jordan received all the process constitutionally due him. The district court denied Jordan’s motion and granted the City’s, then dismissed the action. Jordan appeals and we affirm.

FACTS

Jordan was appointed for a four-year term as City Attorney of Lake Oswego by the City…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Preslie Hardwick v. Marcia VreekenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Conner v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Mester Manufacturing Company v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Lia Yang v. Donna E. Shalala, Hhs, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re City Equities Anaheim, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API