Legal Opinion

Broder v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1894No. 15513PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for a writ of mandate to the Superior Court of Mono County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Application for writ of mandate.

In Broder v. Conklin, 98 Cal. 360, the order of the superior court of Mono county, setting aside a judgment that had been entered on the judgment book of that court in pursuance of certain findings of fact and conclusions of law previously filed therein, was affirmed, and after the remittitur had been filed in the court below the petitioners herein made a motion before that *122court, that a judgment and decree be entered in the cause upon said findings of fact and conclusions of law. This motion was denied by the superior court, and the petitioners have made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Noel v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Alvak Enterprises v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Alvak Enterprises v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API