Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Porter, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 30, 1991No. 90-1191PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, Chief Judge.

Frank Porter appeals his conviction for robbing five banks. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We affirm his conviction. We shall explain why by discussing briefly each of his several claims.

1. Photo identification.

The strongest evidence against Porter consisted of the testimony of six eye witnesses, who identified him, in court, as the robber. Porter argues that the court should have suppressed that testimony because it rested upon previous photo identifications that were 1) “impermissibly suggestive” and 2) created “a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Janosky v. St. AmandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Christian LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Thomas L. MonacoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Barbara HiltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API