Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas L. Monaco

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 10, 1994No. 93-5261PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

The government appeals from Thomas L. Monaco’s sentence, contesting both the district court’s application of, and its downward departure from, the United States Sentencing Guidelines. For the reasons that follow, we will vacate the sentence and remand the cause to the district court.

I

A

The Oxy-Comm Contract

In July 1986, the Department of Defense (“DoD”) awarded Northern Precision Labo- ratones, Inc. (“NPL”) a contract to produce a test set for an aircraft pilot’s oxygen/communications mask (“Oxy-Comm”). Payments were to be made by periodic…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert AdamoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Marva Headley, A/K/A "Brenda"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Cynthia JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Charles Crawford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. In Re McGraw-hill Global Educ. Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Joseph Brown v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API