Bishop v. Children's Center for Developmental Enrichment
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Courtland and Michelle Bishop and their minor disabled son CB1 brought suit against the private school to which CB had been assigned just less than three years after the school expelled CB. Ohio’s statute of limitations, which is applied to their federal constitutional claims, bars suit after two years. They argued their claims were statutorily tolled under Ohio’s minority tolling statute. The district court did not address this argument but instead dismissed the claims as time-barred, because it concluded that equitable tolling was not appropriate. We REVERSE and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Julie Helphenstine v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Frame v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Dorothy Johnson v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Ervine v. Desert View Regional Medical Center Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.