Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Children's Center for Developmental Enrichment

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2010No. 09-3383PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Courtland and Michelle Bishop and their minor disabled son CB1 brought suit against the private school to which CB had been assigned just less than three years after the school expelled CB. Ohio’s statute of limitations, which is applied to their federal constitutional claims, bars suit after two years. They argued their claims were statutorily tolled under Ohio’s minority tolling statute. The district court did not address this argument but instead dismissed the claims as time-barred, because it concluded that equitable tolling was not appropriate. We REVERSE and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Julie Helphenstine v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. Frame v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dorothy Johnson v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Ervine v. Desert View Regional Medical Center Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API