Legal Opinion

Hendron v. Bolander

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1937No. 14,076PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

On June 8, 1933, plaintiffs in error, who were defendants in the court below and will be so called here, delivered to the defendant in error, to whom we shall refer as plaintiff, their note in the principal sum of $2,280, by the terms of which payment was to be made “in monthly installments of $65.00 each, or more at the option of the signers hereof.” It also contained a provision “that on failure to pay any installment of interest or principal when due, the holder hereof may declare the entire principal due and payable.” To secure the payment of the note the defendants executed a deed of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Butterfield v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  3. Hamill v. Bank of Clear Creek CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Beman v. Rocky Ford National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  5. Washburn v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cassiani v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Gerber v. KarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. KIXX, Inc. v. Stallion Music, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Neusteter Realty Co. v. Holzman-Demuth Noteholders (In Re Neusteter Realty Co.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  5. Stone v. LernerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API