Legal Opinion
Hill v. Dickerson
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided October 9, 1992No. 920271-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSON, Judge:
Gina M. Hill appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her case with prejudice. We affirm.
FACTS
In March 1990, Gina M. Hill filed a complaint against Dr. Carl Dickerson, alleging dental malpractice arising from treatment she received from February through April 1986.
The matter was originally set for trial on April 10, 1991. Two days before trial, Hill moved for a continuance of the trial on the ground that her expert witness, her new treating dentist, had declined to testify. Hill, acknowledging the need for expert testimony in order to establish her prima facie…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Christenson v. JewkesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. Leisure Sports Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Maxfield v. FishlerUtah Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Preston & Chambers, P.C. v. KollerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Layton City v. LongcrierCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Rohan v. BosemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Country Meadows Convalescent Center v. Utah Department of Health, Division of Health Care FinancingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.