Legal Opinion

Greeson v. Quicken Loans Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 7, 2022No. 3:22-cv-04877Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAMI GREESON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04877-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER QUICKEN LOANS INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 10 Defendants. The application for a temporary restraining order is denied. The plaintiffs have not shown any likelihood of success on the merits of their claims. See Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,

555 U.S. 7, 20

(2008), and Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell,

632 F.3d 1127, 1131

(9th Cir. 2011). The plaintiffs’ claims rely on the defendants’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Loewy v. CMG Mortg., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API