Legal Opinion
Riggleman
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 29, 1977No. 3-75PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
"This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs, Fred L. Riggleman and Sherri L. Riggleman, husband and wife, seek compensation from the defendant for the use of their farm real estate; the defendant in early' 1967 impounded a number of items of personal property in connection with certain criminal cases, and the items have remained impounded on the farm property since that time. On the basis of the pleadings, briefs, and other materials submitted by the parties, without benefit of oral argument, we grant defendant’s motion.
*866"The facts may be stated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Yokum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986