Legal Opinion

Munson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by John A. Munson against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company for damages. Plaintiff demurred to a part of defendant’s answer.

1Opinion of the CourtDavy, J.

This is a demurrer to that portion of defendant’s answer which alleges that the Glens Falls Insurance Company and the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society of England are proper and necessary parties to this action. The answer, for a second, separate, and distinct defense to the cause of action alleged in the complaint, states that the premises in the complaint described had been and were, at the time of the alleged destruction by fire, insured against loss or damage, in sums unknown to the defendant, by the Glens Falls Insurance Company and by the Norwich Union Fire Insurance 'Society of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Trompen v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Allen & Arnink Auto Renting Co. v. United Traction Co.New York County Court, Albany County · 1915
  4. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API